Remuneration you can count on
Managers want compensation that is reliable and reflective of their
performance in the market, while shareholders value transparency of
performance. Many companies unknowingly face high risks from extreme
compensation payouts. While they focus on absolute bonus targets, a
constantly shifting market environment often undermines these efforts.
The risk of landing in an extreme situation, namely paying no bonus or
paying an excessive bonus is unnecessarily high. These situations are
shown as the red bars in the graphs below. The probability of no payout
(zero compensation, the first red bar in the graph) in the case shown
was almost 22%, which is a clear risk for retention and motivation. At
the same time, the risk for maximum payout was almost 20%, which can
lead to a reputational risk and create expectations that are difficult
to meet (last red bar in the graph). The desirable green bars, where
more performance leads to more pay, are unfortunately rather small
(graph on the left), with only a roughly 30% chance of a favorable
payout. The analysis was made for a large industrial company (LTIP-Articles on LinkedIn). For non-cyclical companies, such as those in the consumer goods
sector, the result is almost the same. For smaller companies, the
results can be even riskier.
Compare these results against the payout probabilities with the Obermatt
Rank Method. The likelihood of compensation payouts falls within a more
reliable range, approximately 75% (compared with less than 30% without
Obermatt).
Before Obermatt
With Obermatt
When Obermatt improves performance measurement by indexing key figures
against a customized peer universe or implements a Triple Bottom Line
view, the risk of unwanted payouts drops while the likelihood of desired
payouts rises. Thus, companies meet the reliability and transparency
demanded by shareholders, while enjoying broader acceptance of
compensation, also internally.
"If a company performs better than others, then its people deserve to
earn more."
Balancing Corporate Interests
Publicly traded companies face significant challenges when it comes to
executive compensation, particularly during uncertain and turbulent
economic times. Compensation systems should align the interests of
executives with those of shareholders, but market volatility and
external pressures can complicate this process. Selecting realistic
and effective performance goals, managing shareholder expectations,
and retaining top talent become increasingly challenging. But there is
a transparent and reliable solution: Indexing Performance.
-
Balancing Pay with Performance and Shareholder Scrutiny:
It's difficult to set realistic compensation targets for executives
in an uncertain market. When performance declines due to external
factors beyond management's control—such as inflation, political
uncertainty, or supply chain disruptions—the company's compensation
committee faces a dilemma. If executive pay is reduced to reflect
the poor performance, it could demotivate key leaders. However, if
the company pays large bonuses or other incentives while laying off
employees or losing money, it faces intense scrutiny from
shareholders, proxy advisory firms, and the public. The transparency
and legitimacy of compensation plans are becoming increasingly
important.
-
Executive Retention:
During uncertain markets, a company’s compensation package can
suffer from unexpectedly low or high payout levels, meaning that the
likelihood of falling within a reasonable payout range is
disappearing. This can mean the risk of losing key talent or having
to justify high payouts to proxy advisors and the public.
The market leader on your side
Obermatt has been involved in the introduction of financial
performance measures into compensation for over 20 years and serves
approximately 52% of Swiss companies with relative performance
measures. While too many companies still limit their long-term
compensation plans to stock returns, Obermatt has experience with all
forms of quantitative performance indicators, which have been
published in
award-winning books and dozens of articles, enabling its clients to
design compensation more reliably. As a customer, you receive the
Triple Bottom Line analysis that serves as the basis for ESG
compensation. Obermatt guides the selection of the financial and ESG
performance indicators, the target setting for each metric, the
calibration of the compensation function and prepares the
documentation of the Compensation Rules. This applies both to annual
compensation, STI (short-term incentive) and multi-year plans, LTI
(long-term incentive).
To help you increase the relevance of strategic non-financial
performance indicators (ESG) in your company, we offer to analyze your
situation free of charge. You will receive a written report on your
compensation system with strengths/weaknesses analysis. CEO Dr.
Hermann Stern presents the results of his analysis to you and other
decision-makers in your company in an in-depth, personal dialogue and
answers your questions.