January 10, 2025

The ESG Ratings Dilemma: Why Different Rating Agencies can't Agree

 

The Rating Disparity Problem

One of the most striking issues with ESG ratings is the substantial variation between different rating agencies. For instance, a Swiss company might score a perfect 10 with Sustainalytics while receiving a dramatically lower score from another rating agency such as LSEG or MSCI. This lack of consistency raises serious questions about the reliability of these ratings.

Why Don't ESG Ratings Converge?

The reason for these disparities lies in the diverse business models and focus areas of different rating agencies:

 

Different Methodologies, Different Results

The methodological approaches vary significantly among agencies:

  • Some agencies use purely numerical evaluations
  • Others incorporate qualitative judgments
  • Some focus specifically on SDG (Sustainable Development Goals) benchmarking
  •  

    The Business Reality

    One expert in the video noted, "It's a money-making machine." Rating agencies have little incentive to converge on their methodologies, as their distinct approaches help maintain their unique market positions in what would otherwise become a commoditized industry.

    Implications for Companies

    The fragmented nature of ESG ratings presents a significant challenge for companies trying to demonstrate their sustainability credentials. While these ratings might serve marketing purposes in sustainability reports, they fall short as credible tools for communicating genuine social and environmental impact to stakeholders.

    Conclusion

    The current state of ESG ratings reflects a fundamental tension between different approaches to measuring corporate sustainability. Because greater standardization in methodology and purpose is not expected due to competition between the ESG raters, companies must look beyond ESG ratings for meaningful ways to assess and communicate their sustainability performance.